WATCHING: Doctor Who s8

READING: Me before you

PLAYING: FF XIII


Most writers were the kids who easily, almost automatically, got A’s in English class. (There are exceptions, but they often also seem to be exceptions to the general writerly habit of putting off writing as long as possible.) At an early age, when grammar school teachers were struggling to inculcate the lesson that effort was the main key to success in school, these future scribblers gave the obvious lie to this assertion. Where others read haltingly, they were plowing two grades ahead in the reading workbooks. These are the kids who turned in a completed YA novel for their fifth-grade project. It isn’t that they never failed, but at a very early age, they didn’t have to fail much; their natural talents kept them at the head of the class.

This teaches a very bad, very false lesson: that success in work mostly depends on natural talent. Unfortunately, when you are a professional writer, you are competing with all the other kids who were at the top of their English classes. Your stuff may not—indeed, probably won’t—be the best anymore.

If you’ve spent most of your life cruising ahead on natural ability, doing what came easily and quickly, every word you write becomes a test of just how much ability you have, every article a referendum on how good a writer you are. As long as you have not written that article, that speech, that novel, it could still be good. Before you take to the keys, you are Proust and Oscar Wilde and George Orwell all rolled up into one delicious package. By the time you’re finished, you’re more like one of those 1940’s pulp hacks who strung hundred-page paragraphs together with semicolons because it was too much effort to figure out where the sentence should end.

Why Writers Are the Worst Procrastinators - Megan McArdle - The Atlantic

The Why Writing Is So Hard field of psychology is very interesting to me.

(via amyelizabeth)

Posted on September 26, 2014   ( 9583)   via  › The Atlantic  

# this  # writing   

mrsfallontimberlake:

People talk about how hard long distance relationships are but nobody talks about the struggle of long distance friendships. I would give my left leg right now to just be able to sit in our pjs and watch movies or to just be able to give a big fucking hug. 

Posted on August 08, 2014   ( 102688)   via  › mrsfallontimberlake  

# giii  # this   

madnessinthemusic:

does anyone else literally get stressed out by how many shows they need to watch like

  • "oh is the second season of that out?"
  • "but i need to watch that one too-"
  • "but all of my friends are telling me to watch that one"
  • *stress*
Posted on August 07, 2014   ( 44383)   via  › madnessinthemusic  

# this   

fulllblownrose:

It’s too hot *opens window* in comes 20 flies, 8 spiders, 17 daddy long legs, 50 moths, 3 dragons and 12 Jehovah’s witnesses.

Posted on July 30, 2014   ( 570417)   via  › fulllblownrose  

# this   

carowley:

guys who rarely wear suits look at least 385% hotter when wearing a suit while guys who usually wear suits look 451% hotter when wearing casual clothes trust me this is science

Posted on May 22, 2014   ( 434225)   via  › buckyandclyde  

# this   

ivywalled:

I wish every day started with a “previously on” so that I’d know which of my life’s plot points were going to be important that day

Posted on May 18, 2014   ( 200103)   via  › ivywalled  

# this   

dereksmate:

felicitysmoak:

reminder: you don’t have to write a character off a show by killing them

Posted on March 18, 2014   ( 10085)   via  › felicitysmoak  

# this  # allison argent  # teen wolf  # tw spoilers   

0101elinatic:

This person deserves the internet award. 

Posted on March 06, 2014   ( 28676)   via  › 0101elinatic  

# this  # stiles stilinski  # teen wolf   

incoloure:

why isn’t it acceptable to just ignore everyone for a few weeks

Posted on March 03, 2014   ( 9757)   via  › incoloure  

# this   

threepipe:

ok but when people say “that character isn’t canonically gay” when they’re talking about a character whose sexuality is never actually mentioned in the books/show/whatever. no. no actually u chose to infer that the character is canonically straight because u think straight is the automatic sexuality of all beings unless the word “gay” is in bolded size 60 font and that’s shitty

Posted on February 02, 2014   ( 33465)   via  › crimnology  

# this